Cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. How time-critical are the so called “golden 72 hours”? Or better “golden 24 hours” and “silver 25–72 hour”? A case control study
نویسندگان
چکیده
INTRODUCTION Early cholecystectomy within 72 hours has been shown to be superior to late or delayed cholecystectomy with regard to outcome and cost of treatment. Recently, immediate cholecystectomy within 24 hours of onset of symptom was proposed as standard procedure for the management of fit patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. We sort to find out if there are any differences in surgical outcomes between patients managed within 24 h and those managed 25-72 h following symptom begin for acute cholecystitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed. The outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 h were compared to those of patients managed 25-72 h following symptom onset for acute cholecystitis. RESULTS 35 patients managed 25-72 h following begin of symptoms were matched with 35 patients with similar baseline features, medical comorbidities and disease severity managed within 24 hours of symptom onset. There were no significant differences in the duration of surgery, postoperative complications, rate of conversion and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION Immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within 24 hour of symptom onset is not superior to surgery 25-72 hour after symptoms begin. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis therefore can be safely performed anytime within the golden 72 h.
منابع مشابه
Esa-randomized Controlled Trial
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in acute cholecystitis with more than 72 hours of symptoms. Background: LC is the treatment of acute cholecystitis, with consensus recommendation that patients should be operated within 72 hours of evolution. Data however remain weak with no prospective study focusing on p...
متن کاملRe: JSLS(2008)12: 282–287 Timing of Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
OBJECTIVE Although many surgeons advocate early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in acute cholecystitis, debate still exists regarding its optimal timing. This study compares the outcome of LC performed within and after 72 hours of admission in patients with acute cholecystitis. METHODS Between January 2001 and December 2006, LC was performed in 196 consecutive patients with acute cholecysti...
متن کاملEarly Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
Objective:Acute cholecystitis (AC) is todaymore andmore treated through laparoscopywith good outcomes, the conversion rate and themorbidity being a little higher than the elective treatment of gallbladder stones though. Themajority of studies show an advantage in favor of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) (under 72hours). The aimof this studywas to evaluate the results of LC for ACwhen la...
متن کاملOperative Timing of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis in a Japanese Institute
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In patients with acute cholecystitis who cannot undergo early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (within 72 hours), 6 weeks to 12 weeks after onset is widely considered the optimal timing for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, there has been no clear consensus about it. We aimed to determine optimal timing for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute chole...
متن کاملAcute Cholecystitis
BACKGROUND The treatment of acute cholecystitis has been controversially discussed in the literature as there are no high-evidence-level data yet for determining the optimal point in time for surgical intervention. So far, the laparoscopic removal of the gallbladder within 72 h has been the most preferred approach in acute cholecystitis. METHODS We conducted a systematic review by including r...
متن کامل